Starring on the race track for this 3rd
round of the race, we have Reading in lane one, neck and neck with Writing in
lane two! Who will win? Throughout the lesson
on 29th September 2022, I realised how reading and writing have the same
ranking in literacy based on their close interlocking connections. I understood that it is important that
students are also made aware of their connection, hence, it is necessary for
teachers to utilise different activities and strategies to enrich students’
literacy skills
I liked that the instructor began the lesson with the saying, “Want to teach a child to read? Give him a pencil. Want to teach a child to write? Give him a book.” (n.d.). In my view, the quote gave a preview of the track ahead of us on the lesson, “The reading and writing connection.” In fact, the quote evoked for a number of us similar interpretations of how reading and writing interrelate. I must say I related to some of the comments given such as using a pencil to annotate as I read or using the pencil as a pointer to guide me while reading. I believe that the other classmates could relate and saw from the inception how reading and writing were connecting.
Based on what I am
currently experiencing at school, another captivating quote shared during the
lesson was by Louisa C. Moats. Her quote
reads, “Effective teachers will recognize where their students are in reading
and writing development and will tailor instruction accordingly.” I made a connection with this quote because I
must say it is now a practice of mine since the present school year
started. Initially, I grouped my
students in three different ability groups in my class. However, since the grouping, three new
students returned from vacation with a wide gap in their abilities within the group
I placed them. Unfortunately, I was not
aware of this before they returned. As
such, several times I had to modify by lessons to suit their abilities and to ensure
that they too can achieve the objectives by the end of the lessons. Having discussed that quote in class, I felt
that as painstaking and time consuming as it is now for me in planning for them,
I understand how it is worth the time and in fact, is the right thing to
do.
I also realised
throughout the lesson, that we were not just receiving information on the
connection between reading and writing but it had some vital information on how
I could improve my reading lessons with my students. I noted some key points and intriguing strategies. In doing so, I intend to bear them in mind
and implement them during reading lessons.
For example, I particularly appreciate that the instructor explained how
“reading and writing involve using knowledge of language structure, including
word structure, and text structure (syntax and style).” Also, that I should ensure
to have students express their connections of the text with real life
situations that they already know, that reading and understanding what they are
reading should cause them to self-question and visualize as they read; they
should be able to determine the importance of the text they are reading, make
inferences, synthesize and monitor comprehension as they read. These strategies and others cleared the smoke
I often experience on the track when I am wondering what I can incorporate in
my reading lesson to make the lesson more meaningful. As such, I can better see ahead now how I can
apply those and other strategies in my future reading lessons.
As it pertains to teaching composition writing,
different aspects of the lesson caused me to reflect on the struggle that some
students have with writing and how I could help them. The diagram below shows a useful strategy I
intend to use to encourage them.
Another captivating strategy for me was to have students write on how
they feel. While this strategy was
discussed, I felt like I was in a spa far away from the race track. I imagined involving my students in the spa
experience to closing their eyes and visualizing the imagery of what is being
read to them. I felt that the strategy would
be an eye opener for them to be able to answer questions and have what to write
about for 15 minutes. In the end, they
would feel proud that they have written a few lines that they can share with
the class. As such, the results of this
strategy must motivate all students to become writers. Moreover, I also think that going through
different texts while focusing on particular genres prior to writing should bring
out and cement the different organizational structures students could use in
their writing. Additionally, on the flip side of reading those
texts, it will give them some ideas of what they can write. Lastly, having noted how reading bridges the
gap for writing and vice versa, along with how we can pass on the knowledge to
show students how they both connect, I believe it should instill that intrinsic
motivation they all need to have when reading and writing.
All-in-all,
I view this lesson as a handy tool box I could pull tools from for my students to
use while on our race track. I also
think that as the students utilise these tools they would understand and relate
experientially how reading and writing are hand in glove, respectively, and
vice versa. I feel that although a good
deal of information was shared during the lesson at a seemingly fast pace, it
was vital information to the connection of reading and writing.
What an interesting introduction Jeneva, it definitely caught my attention.
ReplyDeleteAs I refer back to the quote "Want to teach a child to read? Give him a pencil. Want to teach a child to write? Give him a book." I must admit that I thought it was a trick. I initially thought that Mrs. Romney was trying to trick us because I know that if you want to write, you need a pencil and if you want to read you need to have a book. When teachers were agreeing with the statement I was confused. However, once the following slides in her presentation aided in her explanation of why the statement is indeed correct, and stated why and how writing and reading are interconnected, I definitely had a light-bulb moment.
I often times try to figure out the many strategies many teachers use when coordinating the seating in the class based on the subjects, activities and student's abilities. I love the insight that you're providing on the teacher's perspective on expectations vs the reality; as well as the solutions you've chosen based on the problems that arose.
Thank you for this enlightening view of the last session we had for this course.
:-) Hi Breanna. Thank you for your comment. You made me laugh when you said that, "if you want to write you need a pencil and if you want to read you need to have a book. This too is a fact and the quote turned it around. :-) If we did not know any better today, we would all still say that it was a trick :-). Throughout the session, as the information was presented, it kept turning on light switches for me as well, because the connections made so much relatable sense. In relation to the seating in the classroom, initially, at the beginning of the school year, I group my students based on reading results and student profiles/information from their previous teacher. However, depending on the performance of the students in these initial groups in my class, some students are either moved to a higher or lower group during the school year. I am pleased that my views were an enlightenment to you.
DeleteThank you for your post Jeneva! I too like you and Breanna found the quote, "Want to teach a child to read? Give him a pencil. Want to teach a child to write? Give him a book" very interesting. For me, it was thought-provoking just like many of us in the class, but the discussion as you rightly mentioned revealed that many of us shared similar beliefs relative to the quote and I got a greater insight and a different perspective from the discussion that ensued. Furthermore, I appreciate the use of diagram 1: Reading and Writing Strategy in your reflection which outlines the "read it - think it, write it - think it, talk it - know it" strategy and the fact that you reflected on how students engage in composition and the challenges that they encounter. Just like you, I envisioned how I can assist students in the writing process by employing the same strategy. Just looking at the strategy, I can see the importance of reflection. From the diagram, I can see that" think it" appears twice which confirms my belief. Moreover, I can foresee that there might be some loops regarding the same process as it may not be a linear strategy for some students. What are your thoughts regarding this non-linear concept? Do you see some learners having to revert to different steps in the process before actually "knowing it"?
ReplyDeleteHi Sandra. Indeed, the quote, “Want to teach a child to read? Give him a pencil. Want to teach a child to write? Give him a book” was thought provoking. I even think it was so appropriate to elicit our prior knowledge in the introduction of the lesson. With respect to diagram1, Reading and Writing Strategy, constructivist teaching allows us to accept and in fact encourage our students to take the flexibility to make modifications to what is taught to them. As we know, this is allowed, in an effort to help students curate and justify their understanding and conclusions to information or any given task to attain the objective we hope they would achieve by the end of the lesson. As such, using a non-linear method to the strategy could very well work-out successfully for them. Thanks for the eye-opener on the loophole. This is noteworthy :-).
Delete